Agri-Systems, Inc. v. State of Illinois, Department of Labor et al
| Agri-Systems, Inc. a Montana Corporation doing business as Asi-Industrial |
| State of Illinois, Department of Labor, Jane Flanagan and Robert Parrilli |
| 1:2022cv01085 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Eric I Long |
| James E Shadid |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David C Van Dyke on behalf of Agri-Systems, Inc. (Van Dyke, David) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants, filed by Agri-Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-11, #2 Exhibit 12-15)(Gifford, Michael) |
TEXT ORDER: The Court's 3/22/2022 order to show cause is DISCHARGED. The Plaintiff's counsel has sufficiently explained the basis for filing this case in the Urbana Division of this Court in his Response #4 , and the Court finds the Urbana Division is, indeed, the proper division pursuant to Civil LR 40.1(D). As the Peoria Division was simply inadvertently selected when filing the Complaint, the Court directs the Clerk to TRANSFER this case to the Urbana Division of this Court. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 3/23/2022. (KZ)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Agri-Systems, Inc. . (Gifford, Michael) |
| Set Deadlines: Show Cause Response due by 3/29/2022. (JS) |
|
TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff filed its Complaint #1 in the Peoria Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. The caption of the Complaint indicates the Urbana Division of this Court. The Plaintiff alleges in the Complaint that venue is proper in this Court "in that a substantial part of the events giving rise to this claim occurred in this district, and that the primary offices of Defendants are within this district." However, the Plaintiff does not state, as part of the statement of jurisdiction, the basis for filing in the Urbana Division specifically. See Civil LR 40.1(F). Given who the Defendants are, coupled with the Plaintiff's indication on the Civil Cover Sheet #3 that Sangamon County, Illinois is the county of residence of the first listed Defendant, it is unclear that the Urbana Division is the correct division in which this case should have been filed per the Local Rules. In light of all this, the Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing, by 3/29/2022, why this case should not be transferred to the Springfield Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 3/22/2022. (KZ)
|
| Filing 3 Exhibit re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet by Agri-Systems, Inc., a Montana Corporation, d/b/a ASI-Industrial. (Gifford, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Agri-Systems, Inc., a Montana Corporation, d/b/a ASI-Industrial. (Gifford, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3894548.), filed by Agri-Systems, Inc., a Montana Corporation, d/b/a ASI-Industrial. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit)(Gifford, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
