Ahmad v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Sharjeel Ahmad |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson |
| 1:2022cv01095 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sharjeel Ahmad. (Hacking, James) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sharjeel Ahmad. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 4/4/2022, answer due 6/3/2022; Terri Robinson served on 4/4/2022, answer due 6/3/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 4/4/2022, answer due 6/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS Receipts)(Hacking, James) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (FDS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3899428.), filed by SHARJEEL AHMAD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons USCIS, #3 Summons Jaddou, #4 Summons Robinson, #5 Summons US Att., #6 Summons Att. General)(Hacking, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
