Ruark v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Chad Ruark |
| Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security |
| CSS-Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv01128 |
| April 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chad Ruark. US Attorney served on 5/12/2022, answer due 9/9/2022. (Goetz, David) Modified on 6/6/2022 to indicate US Attorney served pursuant to procedures (AH). |
| Filing 6 SECOND ALIAS Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security (U.S. Attorney)(TK) |
| Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Chad Ruark as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Goetz, David) |
| Filing 4 Alias Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney Office. (VH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Commissioner of Social Security for US Attorney's Office. (Goetz, David) Modified on 5/2/2022 to indicate to whom the Summons was issued (AH). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (VH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-3915993.), filed by Chad Ruark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Goetz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
