Harms v. Tazewell County Sheriff's Office et al
Barry Harms |
Tazewell County Sheriff's Office, Kellen Williams, Brittany Wertz, Michael Kirk, Mark Wells and Nick Copeland |
1:2022cv01159 |
May 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Sara Darrow |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter to the Court from Barry Harms. (Attachments: #1 exhibit) (ANW) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of filing documents re #1 Complaint filed by Barry Harms. (Attachments: #1 State Petition, #2 Motion to Dismiss State, #3 Officers Statements, #4 Misc Indictment/Information, #5 State Court Transcript, #6 State's Motion to Strike with Order to Continue, #7 ARDC Complaint Form, #8 FOIA Request to Illinois Secretary of State)(JRK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Chief Judge Sara Darrow. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Rock Island Division, 322 16th Street, Rock Island, IL 61201. Merit Review Deadline set for 5/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues) (KB) |
Filing 2 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Barry Harms. (KB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Barry Harms. (KB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.