Bane v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
LEANNA MARIE BANE |
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
CSS-Social Security Administration |
1:2022cv01343 |
October 6, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Jonathan E Hawley |
James E Shadid |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Emily S Cohn on behalf of Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Cohn, Emily) |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Leanna Marie Bane as to US Attorney General 11/7/2022. (JS) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration served on 10/17/2022, answer due 2/14/2023. (AH) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/8/2022: #1 Complaint) (AH). |
![]() |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration filed by LEANNA MARIE BANE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(AH) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff LEANNA MARIE BANE. Responses due by 10/20/2022 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summonses)(Konoski, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.