Dulas v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
DAWN DULAS |
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
CSS-Social Security Administration |
1:2022cv01421 |
December 2, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Michael M Mihm |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PROPOSED ORDER: CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (Konoski, Bryan) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Eric Charles Yarnell on behalf of Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Yarnell, Eric) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff DAWN DULAS. Responses due by 12/19/2022.(AEM) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, filed by DAWN DULAS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(AEM) |
![]() |
NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration answer due on 2/3/2023. (AEM) |
![]() |
Judge Michael M. Mihm and Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley added. (TK) |
Filing 1 STRICKEN PURSUANT TO TEXT ORDER ENTERED ON 12/5/22 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff DAWN DULAS. Responses due by 12/16/2022 (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summonses)(Konoski, Bryan) Modified on 12/5/2022 to strike per text order (AEM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.