Burnside et al v. State of Illinois et al
| Brian Armond Burnside, Nicole Renee Burnside and NAB |
| State of Illinois, Katherine Susan Gorman, Mark Edwin Gilles, Jodi Melinda Hoos, Nina Rena Gougis, Hanna Maria Kong, Chandra Lin Justice, City of Peoria Police Department, Eric Echevarria, Christopher Collins, Department of Children and Family Services, Mark D Smith and Angela Kramer |
| 1:2023cv01107 |
| March 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered. (VH) |
TEXT ORDER: In its #5 Order, the Court dismissed some of Plaintiffs' claims with prejudice and others without prejudice, permitting Plaintiffs to seek leave to amend their Complaint as to the latter claims within 14 days. That period of time having expired without filing by Plaintiffs of a motion for leave to amend, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962). This case is terminated, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment. Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 5/9/2023. (VH)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 4/24/2023. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff N.A.B. is dismissed from this case without leave to refile. Remaining Plaintiffs' claims for monetary damages on Counts 9, 12,and 15 against Defendants Eric Echevarria, Christopher Collins, and Angela Kramer are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' claims for monetary damageson Counts 9 and 15 against Defendants Jodi Melinda Hoos, Nine Rena Gougis, Hanna Maria Kong, and Chandra Lin Justice are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All other claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and all other Defendants terminated from the case. Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is DENIED as moot; their Motion for Emergency Injunctive Relief (doc. 4 at 12) is likewise DENIED as moot and because this Court lacks jurisdiction to issue the injunction sought. If Plaintiffs wish to file a second amended complaint, they must first seek and obtain leave of the Court to do so. Any such request must be made within 14 days of this order and accompanied by the proposed amendment, attached to the motion as an exhibit. See full written Order. (VH)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Brian Armond Burnside, Nicole Renee Burnside.(VH) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #3 the Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File amended complaint. The amended complaint is due by 4/18/2023. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 4/11/2023. (KZ)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time/Affidavit by Plaintiffs Brian Armond Burnside, Nicole Renee Burnside. Responses due by 4/24/2023 (VH) |
|
TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff's Complaint 1 includes the full name of a minor. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(3) provides that a party making a filing with the Court may include in the filing only the minor's initials. See also Civil LR 5.11(A). The Clerk is directed to place the Plaintiff's Complaint under seal. The Plaintiff is directed to file a redacted copy of the Complaint that complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a)(3) by 4/3/2023. The Plaintiff must comply with all applicable federal and local rules of procedure. See Pearle Vision, Inc. v. Romm, 541 F.3d 751, 758 (7th Cir. 2008) ("it is... well established that pro se litigants are not excused from compliance with procedural rules"). The Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Text Order may result in dismissal of this case. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 3/20/2023. (KZ)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiffs Nico Al Bey, Brian Armond Burnside, Nicole Renee Burnside. Responses due by 3/31/2023 (TK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
