Wright v. St Joseph's Hospital et al
| Kyleen Wright |
| St Joseph's Hospital and Pontiac Police Department |
| 1:2023cv01158 |
| April 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Pontiac Police Department. (TK) |
Filing 4
ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 6/15/2023: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED in part in that Plaintiff may proceed with his claims against Pontiac Police but denied to the extent that he seeks to proceed against St. Joseph's Hospital. St Joseph's Hospital is DISMISSED due to Plaintiff' s failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the Complaint and prepare the documentation for service of the Complaint by the U.S. Marshals Office. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Counsel #3 is DENIED. (TK)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Kyleen Wright. Responses due by 5/3/2023 (VH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kyleen Wright. Responses due by 5/3/2023 (VH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kyleen Wright.(VH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
