Suarez v Hinthorne
Petitioner: Jose Suarez
Respondent: Cheeryl Hinthorne
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Case Number: 1:2023cv01196
Filed: May 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Michael M Mihm
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2023 Remark: Case transferred from Illinois Central has been opened in Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1 as case 1:23-cv-04241, filed 06/30/2023. (TK)
June 23, 2023 Case transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. (AEM)
June 23, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 6/23/2023. On May 18, 2023, Petitioner filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 challenging two convictions in Cook County, Case Nos. 10-CR-8094 and 13-CR-21572. The Petition asks this Court to vacate his convictions and seeks immediate release from imprisonment. (D. 1, p. 8). In both cases, Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Cook County, Illinois, which is situated in the federal judicial district for the Northern District of Illinois. 28 U.S.C. 93(a)(2). He is currently confined in this District at the Illinois River Correctional Center in Canton, Illinois. While both this Court and the Northern District of Illinois have jurisdiction over this action, this Court deems it appropriate to transfer the case to the Northern District of Illinois. See 28 U.S.C. 2241. Generally, a habeas corpus petition is most desirable in the district where the material events took place and where the records and witnesses are likely found. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky, 410 U.S. 484, 493-94 (1973). Section 1404(a) authorizes the Court to transfer this action to any other district where it might have been brought, based on the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). This Court finds that the Northern District of Illinois is a more convenient forum for the hearing and determination of this habeas corpus action; particularly because potential witnesses and records regarding his convictions are in that District. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241(d) and 1404(a), and on the Court's own motion, it is ORDERED that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for such further proceedings as that Court may deem appropriate. (AEM)
May 24, 2023 Filing fee Received: $ 5.00, receipt number PIA100002402 (AH)
May 18, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jose Suarez.(AH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suarez v Hinthorne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Suarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cheeryl Hinthorne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Habeas Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?