Walker v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Carrington Walker |
United Parcel Service of America, Inc. |
1:2023cv01256 |
July 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Michael M Mihm |
James E Shadid |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Rule 12(B)(6) and Supporting Memorandum of Law by Defendant United Parcel Service of America, Inc.. Responses due by 9/14/2023 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Liles, William) |
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint. Dft United Parcel Service of America, Inc. responsive pleading is due 8/31/2023. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 7/31/23. (WG) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant United Parcel Service of America, Inc.. Responses due by 8/11/2023 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Liles, William) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carrington Walker. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023. (Taylor, Alexander) |
TEXT ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 7/10/23. This case and the corresponding hearings are reassigned to Judge Michael M. Mihm for further proceedings. (TK) |
TEXT ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT. This case and the corresponding hearings are reassigned to Chief Judge Sara Darrow pending reassignment. Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 7/10/23. (TK) |
TEXT ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge James E. Shadid disqualifies and recuses himself from participation in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(a). This matter is referred to Chief Judge Sara Darrow for reassignment. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 7/10/2023. (TK) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (AEM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Carrington Walker (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Alexander James Taylor on behalf of Carrington Walker (Taylor, Alexander) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Parcel Service of America, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4245751.), filed by Carrington Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Summons)(Taylor, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Walker v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carrington Walker | |
Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
Represented By: | Alexander James Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United Parcel Service of America, Inc. | |
Represented By: | William R. Liles |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.