Hawkins v. Menard, Inc.
| Barbara Hawkins |
| Menard, Inc. doing business as Menards |
| 1:2023cv01363 |
| September 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Michael M Mihm |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: This case is set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference before Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 12/1/2023 at 9:30 AM via telephone. Counsel are to phone into conference by calling (551) 285-1373 and enter the Meeting ID: 16009516536 when prompted to do so. Please announce your name each prior to speaking unless the judge asks a question directly to you so time that the speaker may be identified by all. A discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3) shall be filed on or before 11/28/23. The parties may, but are not required to, follow the format of the sample discovery plan set forth as Attachment A to the standing order attached to this text order. If the complaint makes allegations on behalf of a class, the proposed discovery plan should include a deadline for filing a motion to certify class at a stage early in the the case. The Discovery Plan event may be found in the CM/ECF system within the other Documents category. All counsel must read and be familiar with the standing order attached to this text order prior to their Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 10/26/2023. (WG)
|
| Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Menard, Inc..(Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Joseph Scott Davidson on behalf of Menard Inc (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement (Andrews, W) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by W Anthony Andrews on behalf of Menard Inc (Andrews, W) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from McLean County, case number 2023LA000113 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4304946), filed by Menard Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint and Summons, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Andrews, W) Modified on 9/22/2023 (JS). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE Of Removal (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint and Summons, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Andrews, W) Modified on 9/22/2023 (JS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hawkins v. Menard, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barbara Hawkins | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline Marie Cichon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Menard, Inc. doing business as Menards | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Scott Davidson |
| Represented By: | W Anthony Andrews |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
