Haynes v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Michael C. Haynes |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security - Office of the General Counsel |
| 1:2023cv01373 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER concerning Consent to Magistrate Judge. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 12/4/23. (Attachments: #1 Consent Packet)(WG)
|
| Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY TRANSCRIPT. Plaintiff Brief due by 1/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Transcript, #2 Transcript, #3 Transcript, #4 Transcript)(Patel, Hinal) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of CAR Filing in Lieu of Answer (Patel, Hinal) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Hinal A Patel on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Patel, Hinal) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Michael C. Haynes (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4310667.), filed by Michael C. Haynes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew) |
| NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 12/1/2023. (JS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
