Rowley v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Gina Marie Rowley |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security - Office of the General Counsel |
| 1:2023cv01391 |
| October 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 12/18/2023. (AEM) |
TEXT ORDER: The Court notes that the Plaintiff attached summonses to the Complaint. On 12/1/2022, the Supplemental Rules for Social Security went into effect. See PUBLIC NOTICE RE: THE ELIMINATION OF CIVIL LOCAL RULE 8.1 (Social Security Cases), 4:22-go-9 (Dec. 1, 2022). The Supplemental Rules specify how service will be effectuated. The Plaintiff's counsel is expected to comply with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 10/16/2023. (KZ)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4319435.), filed by Gina Marie Rowley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Notice of Decision-Unfavorable, #2 Exhibit B- Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Comerford, Ida) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
