Denison v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Robin Denison
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Case Number: 1:2023cv01438
Filed: December 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Joe Billy McDade
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2024 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 1/16/2024. Plaintiff filed #4 , purporting to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction for the remainder of these proceedings. While the undersigned takes no issue with that course of action, the form submitted by Plaintiff omits consent by Defendant Commissioner. The undersigned cannot refer this matter under 8 U.S.C. 636(c) unless all parties consent to the referral. The Court therefore directs the parties to obtain the consent of all parties or take other action that would permit referral under 636(c). Otherwise, these proceedings will continue on the undersigned's docket. (LH)
January 4, 2024 Filing 4 PROPOSED ORDER: CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (Konoski, Bryan)
December 7, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jean M Godfrey on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Godfrey, Jean)
December 6, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Robin Denison. Responses due by 12/20/2023 (Konoski, Bryan)
December 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Robin Denison. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Konoski, Bryan)
December 6, 2023 NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 2/5/2024. (VH)
December 6, 2023 Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley no longer assigned to case. (VH)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is excused from paying the fees associated with this action. The Clerk has notified the Commissioner of the commencement of this action per Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security. Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 12/6/2023.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Denison v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin Denison
Represented By: Bryan Matthew Konoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: US ATTY-PEORIA SSA
Represented By: Jean M Godfrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?