Johnston v. Leroy et al
| Suzanne L Johnston |
| Ryan Leroy, Heather Leroy, Jessica Gentzgow, . Bryce, Courtney, Beth, Kevin Vandusen, UPS, PJ Hoerr Construction, Jennifer Schroeder, Lance Hughes, Casey Hughes and Casey Conger-Williams |
| 1:2024cv01027 |
| January 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered. (TK) |
Filing 5
ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 1/26/2024: Johnston's petition (Doc. 2) to proceed IFP and motion (Doc. 3) for the appointment of counsel in Johnston v. Leroy, et al., JES-24-1027 (C.D. Ill. Jan. 17, 2024), are DENIED, and her Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. (TK)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Suzanne L Johnston. Plaintiff's new address is 328 E. Elmhurst Ave., Peoria, IL 61603. (TK) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Suzanne L Johnston. Responses due by 1/31/2024. (MJC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Suzanne L Johnston. Responses due by 1/31/2024. (MJC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Suzanne L Johnston. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(MJC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
