Johnston v. Swaminathan et al
| Suzanne L Johnson and Suzanne L Johnston |
| Swaminathan, Shay and Watson-Schmidt |
| 1:2024cv01057 |
| February 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| James E Shadid |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT in favor of Shay, Swaminathan, Watson-Schmidt against Suzanne L Johnston. (BL) |
Filing 4
ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 2/5/2024: The above cases are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Motions for Leave to Proceed IFP and Motions for Recruitment of Counsel are DENIED. Plaintiff is prohibited from future filings until the $150 sanction is paid, any amount which must be paid no later than 30 days from this date. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (BL) Modified on 2/6/2024 to add reference to written Order. (BL).
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Suzanne L Johnston. Responses due by 2/14/2024 (JMB) Modified on 2/2/2024 to correct a typographical error. (JMB). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Suzanne L Johnston. Responses due by 2/14/2024 (JMB) Modified on 2/2/2024 to correct a typographical error. (JMB). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Suzanne L Johnston.(JMB) Modified on 2/2/2024 to correct a typographical error. (JMB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
