Gordon v. Smith
| Samuel L Gordon |
| Marc Smith |
| 1:2024cv01343 |
| September 24, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT entered. (RAH) |
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 11/18/2024. Gordon's motion #2 to proceed IFP and motion #3 for the appointment of counsel are DENIED, and his Complaint #1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. See written Order. (RAH)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 11/17/2024. Due to Judge Jonathan E. Hawley's confirmation as a District Judge, this case is no longer referred to Judge Jonathan E. Hawley. Any previously scheduled hearings are reset before the presiding judge.
|
| Filing 5 Letter from Pro Se Plaintiff Samuel Gordon. (RAH) |
|
TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff's #1 Complaint includes full addresses, which must be redacted under the Local Rules governing appearances before this Court. Addresses may contain only the city and state of residence. L.R. 5.11. The Clerk is directed to place Plaintiff's #1 Complaint under seal. Plaintiff is directed to file a redacted copy of the Complaint that complies with Local Rule 5.11. Additionally, Plaintiff has filed an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) (Doc. 2) in connection with his filing of a civil action. In support of his Application, Plaintiff states under penalty of perjury that within the last twelve months he has received income from disability, or worker's compensation payments. Plaintiff has not attached a form that shows he receives any payments and must provide complete information. Plaintiff has not listed the amounts of the disability, or worker's compensation payments he received within the last twelve months as required by Question 3(d). Therefore, Plaintiff is instructed to amend his Application within fourteen days of this Order by including the information mentioned above. If Plaintiff fails to do so, his Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis will be denied. Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 9/27/2024. (NJR) Modified on 10/1/2024 to correct typos (TK).
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Samuel Gordon. Responses due by 10/8/2024. (RAH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Samuel Gordon. Responses due by 10/8/2024. (RAH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marc Smith filed by Samuel Gordon. (RAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gordon v. Smith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Marc Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samuel L Gordon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
