Rico v. Doe
| Miguel Rico |
| John Doe |
| 1:2025cv01041 |
| January 31, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| James E Shadid |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 2/27/25 granting #5 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $12.14. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff`s account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Prisoner Prepayment due by 3/31/2025(ANW)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Plaintiff Miguel Rico. Responses due by 3/12/2025 (VH) |
| Filing 8 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Miguel Rico. (VH) |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Plaintiff Miguel Rico. Responses due by 3/7/2025 (VH) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/14/2025. (ANW) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 2/20/2025. On January 31, 2025, Plaintiff Miguel Rico filed a Complaint #1 , which lists nine additional Plaintiffs. However, the pleading is only signed by Plaintiff. Because Plaintiff is not a lawyer, he cannot represent anyone but himself; thus, all Plaintiffs are required to sign every filing. See AsymaDesign, LLC v. CBL & Assocs. Mgmt., Inc., 103 F.4th 1257, 125859 (7th Cir. 2024) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a)). District Courts must strike unsigned pleadings. Marcure v. Lynn, 992 F.3d 625 (7th Cir. 2021). The Clerk is directed to STRIKE Plaintiff's Complaint #1 . Plaintiff is allowed 21 days to file a Complaint either 1) naming himself solely as Plaintiff, or 2) signed by all Plaintiffs. If multiple Plaintiffs intend to sue together, each will be required to pay a filing fee or file their own request to proceed without prepayment of fees. Failure to file an Amended Complaint within 21 days will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice.(ANW)
|
| Filing 6 Letter Requesting Trust Fund Ledger. Trust fund ledger sheets due by 3/5/2025. (KE) |
| Filing 5 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Miguel Rico.(VH) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 2/10/2025. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Pauperis #4 that fails to contain the information required for the Court to decide whether he should be permitted to proceed as a poor person under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff's motion #4 is DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the $405.00 filing fee in full or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis on the form the Court previously provided within 14 days of this Order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. (SAG)
|
| Filing 4 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Miguel Rico.(VH) |
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 1/31/2025. Plaintiff has filed a Complaint but has not paid the $405 filing fee nor filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 21 days of the entry of this order, Plaintiff must pay the $405 filing fee in full or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis with attached trust fund ledgers for the last 6 months. Failure to comply without good cause will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice, and the Plaintiff will still be responsible for payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1914. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis.(SAG)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division,100 NE Monroe Street,Peoria,IL 61602.Merit Review Deadline set for 2/20/2025. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG) |
| Filing 1 STRICKEN pursuant to 2/20/25 Text Order - COMPLAINT against John Doe, filed by Miguel Rico.(SAG) Modified on 2/20/2025 to strike (ANW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rico v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Miguel Rico | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
