Walker v. Doe
| Tyler Walker |
| John Doe |
| 1:2025cv01163 |
| April 28, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail sent to Tyler Walker (Text Order entered 5/29/25) Returned as Undeliverable. (RAH) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/29/2025. On April 28, 2025, Plaintiff filed this case under 42 USC Section 1983, alleging a violation of his Constitutional rights. However, Plaintiff did not pay the required filing fee, nor did he move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, that same day, the Court entered an Order advising Plaintiff that he must either pay the filing, in fill, or he must move for IFP status before he may litigate this case. On May 8, 2025, the Court received, as undeliverable, that Order and other notices that the Court had sent to Plaintiff. That same day, the Court entered an Order giving Plaintiff fourteen (14) days to provide his current address to the Court, and the Court warned him that, if he did not do so, the Court would dismiss this case. The Court's May 8, 2025 Order was also returned as undeliverable. As of today, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's Orders, nor has he complied with Local Rule 163.(K) that requires him to provide his current address, nor has he paid the filing fee. Local Rule 16.3(K) requires every pro se plaintiff to inform the Court of any change of address that occurs during the pendency of his case. Failure to comply with this Local Rule results in the dismissal of the case. Id. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Orders, and with the Court's Local Rules, in that, he has not kept the Court informed, in writing, of his current address. Plaintiff has also not paid the filing fee or moved for IFP status. As a result, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based upon Plaintiff's failure to comply with Local Rule 16.3(K) and with the Court's Orders and based upon his failing to pay the filing fee. No judgment to enter. (KE)
|
| Filing 4 Mail sent to Tyler Walker (Text Order entered 5/8/25) Returned as Undeliverable. (RAH) |
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/8/2025. Court docket entry #2 and Text Order entered 4/28/25, sent to plaintiff Tyler Walker has been returned as undeliverable. Within 14 days of the entry of this order, plaintiff is directed to show good cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to keep the Court informed of plaintiff's address. Failure to show good cause will result in dismissal of this case. (RAH)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 5/19/2025. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tyler Walker.(KE) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/28/2025. Plaintiff has filed a Complaint but has not paid the $405 filing fee nor filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 21 days of the entry of this order, Plaintiff must pay the $405 filing fee in full or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis with attached trust fund ledgers for the last 6 months. Failure to comply without good cause will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice, and the Plaintiff will still be responsible for payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1914. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis. (KE)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Walker v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tyler Walker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/29/2025. On April 28, 2025, Plaintiff filed this case under 42 USC Section 1983, alleging a violation of his Constitutional rights. However, Plaintiff did not pay the required filing fee, nor did he move for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, that same day, the Court entered an Order advising Plaintiff that he must either pay the filing, in fill, or he must move for IFP status before he may litigate this case. On May 8, 2025, the Court received, as undeliverable, that Order and other notices that the Court had sent to Plaintiff. That same day, the Court entered an Order giving Plaintiff fourteen (14) days to provide his current address to the Court, and the Court warned him that, if he did not do so, the Court would dismiss this case. The Court's May 8, 2025 Order was also returned as undeliverable. As of today, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's Orders, nor has he complied with Local Rule 163.(K) that requires him to provide his current address, nor has he paid the filing fee. Local Rule 16.3(K) requires every pro se plaintiff to inform the Court of any change of address that occurs during the pendency of his case. Failure to comply with this Local Rule results in the dismissal of the case. Id. Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Orders, and with the Court's Local Rules, in that, he has not kept the Court informed, in writing, of his current address. Plaintiff has also not paid the filing fee or moved for IFP status. As a result, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based upon Plaintiff's failure to comply with Local Rule 16.3(K) and with the Court's Orders and based upon his failing to pay the filing fee. No judgment to enter. (KE)