Feeback v. Barnett et al
| Travis Feeback |
| Timothy Barnett, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, John Doe, Andre Matevousian, . Walters, John Doe, II, . Kouri, . Houis, . Mangold, . Stiltner and . Bell |
| 1:2025cv01205 |
| May 27, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 11/12/2025. Plaintiff's motion for dismissal of filing fee #15 is DENIED. "The law does not allow the court to waive the filing fee for prisoners, even if the prisoner does not have enough money to pay the fee at the time of filing. A prisoner must pay a filing fee for every complaint he files-even if the court ends up dismissing the complaint or ruling against him. If a prisoner files more than one complaint, he must pay a separate filing fee for each complaint filed." Williams v. Doe, 2024 WL 5398533, * 1 (E.D. Wis. May 21, 2024). Therefore, Plaintiff's motion is denied. (KE)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION Requesting Dismissal of Court Payments by Plaintiff Travis Feeback. Responses due by 11/24/2025 (RES) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 10/6/2025. Plaintiff's motion to reconsider under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) #12 is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to transfer #13 is DENIED. See written order. (KE)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Transfer Courts by Plaintiff Travis Feeback. Responses due by 10/16/2025 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(RES) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Reconsideration regarding #10 Judgment by Plaintiff Travis Feeback. Responses due by 10/16/2025 (RES) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 9/30/2025. Plaintiff's motion for status #11 is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of the docket sheet in this case to Plaintiff. If he did not receive a copy of the Court's September 15, 2025 Merit Review Order, the Court will re-send a copy of the Merit Review Order to him upon his request. (KE)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Status by Plaintiff Travis Feeback. Responses due by 10/14/2025 (RES) |
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT entered. (KE) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 9/15/2025. Plaintiff's Complaint and this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider Plaintiff's asserted claim. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in Defendants' favor and against Plaintiff. All other pending motions are denied as moot, and this case is terminated. All deadlines and settings on the Court's calendar are vacated. If he wishes to appeal this judgment, Plaintiff must file a notice of appeal with this Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). If he wishes to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, Plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis must identify the issues that he will present on appeal to assist the Court in determining whether the appeal is taken in good faith. If he chooses to appeal, Plaintiff will be liable for the $605.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. See written order. (KE)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Status by Plaintiff Travis Feeback. Responses due by 9/11/2025 (Attachments: #1 envelope)(RES) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT by Travis Feeback. (RES) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Travis Feeback (RES) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Travis Feeback (JA) |
| Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 6/16/2025, in the amount of $ 39.57; receipt number 200001952. (BMG) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Travis Feeback (KE) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Travis Feeback.(KE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 6/16/2025. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Travis Feeback. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(KE) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/27/2025. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $39.57. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff`s account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month`s income credited to Plaintiff`s account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff`s account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff`s place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Prisoner Prepayment due by 6/26/2025. (KE)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
