ArcelorMittal Long Products Canada G.P. v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc
| ArcelorMittal Long Products Canada G.P. |
| Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc doing business as Liberty Steel & Wire Peoria |
| 1:2025cv01358 |
| August 25, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Ronald L Hanna |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE entered by District Judge Jonathan E Hawley on 2/9/2026. See full Written Order. (DW)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Without Prejudice by Plaintiff ArcelorMittal Long Products Canada G.P.. Responses due by 2/17/2026 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice)(Sniadanko, Jeffrey) |
|
TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), and finding good cause shown, Defendants' #8 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer is GRANTED. Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to February 3, 2026. Entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna on January 20, 2026. (NL)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by Defendant Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. Responses due by 1/30/2026 (Rolf, David) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint and Briefing Schedule by Defendant Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. Responses due by 12/1/2025 (Rolf, David) |
|
TEXT ORDER: Defendant Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.'s unopposed #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), the Court may, for good cause, extend time when a request to do so is made before the original deadline expires. Keystone explains that it is in negotiations with Plaintiff's counsel and requires additional time to investigate the complaint's factual allegations. Accordingly, the Court finds good cause for the requested extension. Keystone must file an answer or other responsive motion to Plaintiff's #1 complaint on or by January 20, 2026. Entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna on 11/17/2025. (MJS)
|
|
TEXT ORDER: Defendant has filed a #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and to set a briefing schedule in the event its responsive pleading is a motion. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), the Court finds good cause to extend the deadline. Accordingly, Defendant's request for additional time is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its responsive pleading on or before 11/21/2025. With respect to Defendant's request that the Court enter a briefing schedule in advance of any motion, the request is DENIED AS PREMATURE. In the event a motion is filed, briefing will proceed under CDIL-LR 7.1(B): responses are due within 14 days after service of the motion. A reply is not authorized as of right and will be permitted only upon leave of Court, in which case it must be filed within 7 days after service of the response. Entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna on 9/26/2025. (NL)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, and Briefing Schedule by Defendant Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. Responses due by 10/9/2025 (Rolf, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Brian Daniel Lee on behalf of Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc (Lee, Brian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David A Rolf on behalf of Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc (Rolf, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Robert J Hannen on behalf of ArcelorMittal Long Products Canada G.P. (Hannen, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. Summons returned to attorney of record to effectuate service. (DW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc, Liberty Steel & Wire - Peoria ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILCDC-4813196.), filed by ArcelorMittal Long Products Canada G.P.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Sniadanko, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ArcelorMittal Long Products Canada G.P. v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ArcelorMittal Long Products Canada G.P. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey M Sniadanko |
| Represented By: | Robert J Hannen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc doing business as Liberty Steel & Wire Peoria | |
| Represented By: | David A Rolf |
| Represented By: | Brian Daniel Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
