Donley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Amy R. Donley
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Case Number: 1:2025cv01440
Filed: October 27, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Ronald L Hanna
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 TEXT ORDER: Defendant's #14 Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), the Court may, for good cause, extend the time when a request is made before the original deadline expires. The Court finds good cause for the requested extension. Accordingly, Commissioner's brief must be filed on or before May 22, 2026. This is the last extension granted for Defendant without extenuating circumstances. Entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna on April 23, 2026.(NL)
April 22, 2026 Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 Brief Unopposed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Responses due by 5/6/2026 (Levitt, David)
March 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER: Defendant's unopposed #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), the Court may, for good cause, extend the time when a request is made before the original deadline expires. The Court finds good cause for the requested extension. Accordingly, Commissioner's brief must be filed on or before April 22, 2026. Entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna on March 23, 2026. (NL)
March 20, 2026 Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 Brief Unopposed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Responses due by 4/3/2026 (Levitt, David)
February 19, 2026 Filing 11 BRIEF by Amy R. Donley. (Farr, Eric)
January 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Magistrate Judge Ronald L Hanna Entered by District Judge Jonathan E Hawley on 1/23/26. (ED)
January 22, 2026 Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER: CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (Patel, Hinal)
January 22, 2026 Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY TRANSCRIPT. Plaintiff Brief due by 2/23/2026. (Attachments: #1 Transcript, #2 Transcript, #3 Transcript, #4 Transcript, #5 Transcript, #6 Transcript, #7 Transcript, #8 Transcript, #9 Transcript, #10 Transcript, #11 Transcript, #12 Transcript, #13 Transcript, #14 Transcript)(Patel, Hinal)
January 22, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Certified Administrative Record in Lieu of Answer (Patel, Hinal)
January 22, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Hinal A Patel on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Patel, Hinal)
December 18, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: The Commissioner's #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), the Court may, for good cause, extend time when a request is made before the original deadline expires. Based on the circumstances discussed in Defendant's motion, the court finds good cause. Accordingly, the Commissioner must answer Plaintiff's complaint on or by January 26, 2026. Entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna on December 18, 2025. (NL)
December 17, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Unopposed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Responses due by 12/31/2025 (Levitt, David)
December 17, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David H Levitt on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Levitt, David)
October 27, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Amy R. Donley (Richter, Matthew)
October 27, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Eric Adam Farr on behalf of Amy R. Donley (Farr, Eric)
October 27, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILCDC-4855715.), filed by Amy R. Donley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Farr, Eric)
October 27, 2025 NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 12/26/2025. (JPL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Donley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy R. Donley
Represented By: Eric Adam Farr
Represented By: Matthew Frederick Richter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: David H Levitt
Represented By: Hinal A Patel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?