Galicia v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Mia Grace Galicia |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security - Office of the General Counsel |
| 1:2026cv01342 |
| August 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Ronald L Hanna |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff's #3 Petition for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiffs petition was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates that Plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee in this action. Entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna on August 10, 2026. (NL)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mia Grace Galicia. Responses due by 8/24/2026 (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Mia Grace Galicia. (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Mia Grace Galicia. (Attachments: #1 AC decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marvin, Cody) |
| NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 10/9/2026. (MLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
