Aebischer v. Stryker Corporation
2:2005cv02121 |
May 24, 2005 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice Office |
David G. Bernthal |
Michael P. McCuskey |
Both |
Diversity |
28:1441 Notice of Removal- Medical Malpractice |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 218 OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 11/24/08. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The motions which were filed in this case and which were pending at the time the case was terminated are hereby considered moot. (2) Any motions which t he parties believe should be decided by this court prior to trial, including motions for summary judgment, must be filed by January 5, 2009. Responses to any motions filed are due by January 30, 2009. Any replies are due by February 13, 2009. (3) A telephone status conference is hereby scheduled for February 27, 2009, at 4:00 p.m. At the telephone status conference, this court will schedule a jury trial and a hearing on evidentiary matters, including Daubert issues, to be held prior to trial. See written Order. (VB, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Aebischer v. Stryker Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.