Harris et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
| Candy L Harris and Lynn Harris |
| Wal-Mart Stores Inc |
| Wal-Mart Stores Inc |
| Candy L Harris |
| 2:2007cv02041 |
| February 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Macon |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Michael P. McCuskey |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 7/2/09. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Defendant's Post Trial Motion 79 is DENIED in its entirety. See written Opinion. (VB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
53
OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 4/16/2009. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) Defendant's Motions in Limine 44 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (2) Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine 45 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (3) This case remains scheduled for a final pretrial conference on April 16, 2009, at 1:30 p.m. and for a jury trial on May 4, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. (MT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 9/10/08. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is DENIED. (2) This case remains scheduled for a final pretrial conference on October 10, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. and a jury trial on October 20, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. See written Opinion. (VB, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
