Lincoln Diagnostics, Inc. v. Panatrax Inc
| Lincoln Diagnostics, Inc. |
| Panatrax Inc |
| 2:2007cv02077 |
| April 18, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Macon |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Michael P. McCuskey |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 11/16/09. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) Defendant's Motion for Partial Stay of Injunction 155 is DENIED. (2)Defendant's Motion to Suspend Finality of Judgment on the Merits Pending Decision of Attorney's Fee Motion 156 is DENIED as moot. (3) Defendant's Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment 157 is DENIED in its entirety. (4) Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the total amount of $133,904.3 5. (5) Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Declaration of Paul E. Adami and Motion for Sanctions 163 is GRANTED. Defendant is ordered to pay Plaintiff the attorney's fees it incurred in filing its Motion to Strike and for Sanctions. Plaintiff is allowed fourteen (14) days to submit an affidavit setting out the attorney's fees incurred in filing its Motion to Strike. Defendant is allowed seven (7) days to file objections to the reasonableness of the fees sought. (6) Defendant's Motion to Withdraw Motion for Partial Stay of Injunction 166 is DENIED as moot. (7) Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Reply to the Responses of the Plaintiff to Defendant's Motion for Partial Stay of Injunction and Motion to Withdraw Motion for Partial Stay of Injunction 168 is DENIED as moot. (8) Defendant's Motion to Waive Requirement for Filing of Memorandum of Law in Support of Reply 169 is DENIED as moot. See written Order. (VB, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
153
JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff, Lincoln Diagnostics, Inc. against Defendant, Panatrex Inc. See judgment. (SLJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
122
OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 3/11/09 granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion in Limine. This case remains scheduled for a final pretrial conference on March 13, 2009, at 1:30 p.m. and a bench trial on damages on March 23, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees 114 remains pending and will be resolved following the bench trial. See written Opinion. (SLJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
118
OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 2/18/09 granting 68 and 73 Motions for Sanctions; granting 104 Motion for Order to Bar Contradictions to Deposition and for Sanctions. Defendant's response to 115 is due by 2/27/09. Bench Trial remains set for 3/23/09 at 9:30 AM before Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey. See written Opinion. (SLJ, ilcd) Modified on 2/18/2009 to correct clerical error. (SLJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
93
OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 9/16/08. Plaintiff's Motion for Reimbursement of Reasonable Expenses, Including Attorney's Fees 80 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is allowed 30 days to submit an affidavit documenting the atto rney's fees and costs Plaintiff incurred in responding to Defendant's Motion for Protective Order 59 and Second Motion for Protective Order 71 . This should include the time spent by Plaintiff's counsel at the hearings held on the Motions. Defendant is allowed 14 days to file objections to Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees and costs. Plaintiff's Motion for Directions 81 is GRANTED. This court finds that Defendant lacks any viable claim of privilege fo r the e-mail book intentionally sent to Plaintiff's counsel by Dr. Hsiao. Accordingly, Plaintiff need not return or safeguard the documents included in the e-mail book. This case remains scheduled for a telephone status conference on September 22, 2008, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff's Motions for Sanctions 68 and 73 remain pending. Prior to ruling on the pending Motions, this court will inquire at the telephone status conference as to whether Defendant has completely complied with this court's May 29, 2008 order directing full compliance with written discovery. See written Order. (SLJ, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lincoln Diagnostics, Inc. v. Panatrax Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lincoln Diagnostics, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael J Kehart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Panatrax Inc | |
| Represented By: | Michael A Berns |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
