Ramada Worldwide Inc v. Royal Hospitality Inc et al
| Ramada Worldwide Inc |
| Royal Hospitality Inc and Ranjnikant Bhagat |
| 2:2007cv02215 |
| November 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Michael P. McCuskey |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
JUDGMENT in favor of Ramada Worldwide Inc against Royal Hospitality Inc, Ranjnikant Bhagat. See judgment. (SLJ, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
21
OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 2/18/09 granting 20 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants on Plaintiffs Complaint 1 . Judgment is entered against Defe ndants in the following amounts: (1) recurring fees in the principal amount of $68,571.78; (2) interest on recurring fees in the amount of $17,856.96; (3) liquidated and Addendum damages in the amount of $101,000.00; (4) interest on li quidated and Addendum damages in the amount of $24,805.38; (5) attorney fees in the amount of $31,385.60; and (6) costs in the amount of $1,004.91. This case is terminated. Therefore, the final pretrial conference set for March 27, 2009, at 11:00 a.m. and the bench trial scheduled for April 6, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. are hereby VACATED. See written Opinion. (SLJ, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
