Viscofan USA Inc v. Flint Group

Viscofan USA Inc v. Flint Group

Plaintiff:	Viscofan USA Inc
Defendant:	Flint Group
Case Number:	2:2008cv02066
Filed:	March 11, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Contract: Other Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	David G. Bernthal
Presiding Judge:	Michael P. McCuskey
Nature of Suit:	Both
Cause of Action:	Diversity
Jury Demanded By:	28:1441 Notice of Removal

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 7, 2009	Filing 31 ORDER entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 5/7/09 adopting Report and Recommendations 29 . Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens 16 is denied. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (SLJ, ilcd)
April 13, 2009	Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal on 4/13/2009 re 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens filed by Flint Ink Winschoten B.V. This Court recommends that Defendant Motion ToDismiss for Forum Non Co nveniens 16 be DENIED. The parties are advised that any objection to this recommendation must be filed in writing with the clerk within ten working days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to object will constitute a waiver of objections on appeal. Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). Objections to R&R due by 4/30/2009(MT, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 7, 2009

Filing 31 ORDER entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 5/7/09 adopting Report and Recommendations 29 . Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens 16 is denied. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (SLJ, ilcd)

April 13, 2009

Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal on 4/13/2009 re 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens filed by Flint Ink Winschoten B.V. This Court recommends that Defendant Motion ToDismiss for Forum Non Co nveniens 16 be DENIED. The parties are advised that any objection to this recommendation must be filed in writing with the clerk within ten working days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to object will constitute a waiver of objections on appeal. Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). Objections to R&R due by 4/30/2009(MT, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Viscofan USA Inc v. Flint Group
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Viscofan USA Inc
Represented By:	Steven H Hoeft
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Flint Group
Represented By:	William D Serritella
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?