Quinn v. Krauel
Plaintiff: Lamar T Quinn
Defendant: Bradley J Krauel
Case Number: 2:2009cv02033
Filed: February 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: David G. Bernthal
Presiding Judge: Michael P. McCuskey
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 OPINION entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 3/1/2010. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 23 is GRANTED. The case is terminated. The final pretrial scheduled on April 9, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. and the jury trial scheduled on April 19, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. are hereby VACATED. See written opinion. (Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff Lamar Quinn.) (SP, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quinn v. Krauel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lamar T Quinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradley J Krauel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?