Carter v. Ameji et al
| Leander Carter |
| Bashir Ameji, Mary Miller, John Myers, Keith Anglin, Terry Fueyo, Michael Pruisis and Wexford Health Sources |
| 2:2009cv02247 |
| October 6, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Johnson |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Michael P. McCuskey |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
OPINION Entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 10/13/11. Plaintiff directed to submit a brief informing the court of his grounds for appealing within 21 days. See written order. Copy to pro se plaintiff at SHAWNEE Shawnee Correctional Center Inmate Mail/Parcels 6665 State Rd Rt 146 E Vienna, IL 62995. ( Miscellaneous Deadline 11/3/2011) (KW, ilcd)
|
Filing
109
JUDGMENT in favor of Bashir Ameji, Terry Fueyo against Leander Carter. Case terminated. Parties are to bear their own costs. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff at SHAWNEE Shawnee Correctional Center Inmate Mail/Parcels 6665 State Rd Rt 146 E Vienna, IL 62995. (KW, ilcd)
|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Entered by Chief Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 8/26/11. Defendants Myers and Anglin's motion for summary judgment 85 is granted. See written opinion. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff at Leander Carter B09162 SHAWNEE Shawnee Correctional Center Inmate Mail/Parcels 6665 State Rd Rt 146 E Vienna, IL 62995. (KW, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.