Volkman v. Randle et al
| Dwayne Volkman |
| Michael Randle, Roger Walker, Lee Ryker, Marc Hodge, Brian Stafford and Barbara Hess |
| 2:2010cv02132 |
| June 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Lawrence |
| Harold A. Baker |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 03/22/2012. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. For the reasons stated in Written Opinion, Plaintiff's speech was not constitutionally protected and, even if it were, Defendants would be entitled to qualified immunity. The jury trial scheduled for June 12, 2012 is VACATED. Judgment is entered in favor Defendants and against Plaintiff. CASE CLOSED. (DM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
22
OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 11/15/2011. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. For the reasons stated, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 17) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendants Randle, Walker, and Stafford are entitled t o summary judgment on Count I, and all the Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on Count II. The official capacity claims against Defendants Hodge, Ryker and Hess are DISMISSED. Count I remains pending against Defendants Hodge, Ryker, and Hess in their individual capacities. This matter remains scheduled for a final pretrial conference on December 12, 2011 at 2:30 p.m. (DM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
