Sousa v. Anglin et al
| Jeffrey Paul Sousa |
| Keith Anglin, . Campbell, Gladyse Taylor and . Waller |
| 2:2011cv02132 |
| May 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Lee |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Michael P. McCuskey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 7/22/14. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 87 is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 83 is DENIED. Defendant's Motion to Strike 86 is deemed MOOT. This case is terminated. See written Order. (TC, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 3/7/14. Defendants' Combined Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions 77 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion to compel is GRANTED and Plaintiff is ordered to successfully complete the deposition, without incident, at the Office of the Attorney General in Springfield, Illinois, at a time to be agreed upon by the parties. Defendants' motion for sanctions is DENIED. This case remains set for a telephone status conference on 4/14/14 at 9:30 AM. Copy mailed to Jeffrey Paul Sousa, 4052 West 63rd Street, Apt 2C, Chicago, IL 60629. See written Order. (TC, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
