Fluker v. County of Kankakee et al
| Roy Fluker |
| County of Kankakee and Kankakee County Sheriff's Office |
| 2:2011cv02254 |
| October 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Kankakee |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Michael P. McCuskey |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
OPINION entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 5/10/2013. Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss 69 is DENIED. Plaintiff's objections 81 are DENIED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 63 is GRANTED. See written opinion. This case is terminated. (JMW, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal on 11/1/2012. Plaintiffs' Motion 55 is GRANTED as to the medical exam and DENIED as to the request for medical records. See written order. (JMW, ilcd) Modified on 11/1/2012 to show the document as an opinion. (JMW, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 7/25/2012. It is ordered that The Report and Recommendation 41 is accepted by this court. Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint 29 is DENIED. Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint 31 is GRANTED. See written order. (DE, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
