Fonder v. Kankakee County et al
| Darnell Flonder |
| Sheriff of Kankakee County, Kankakee County, City of Kankakee, . Trudeau and . Wagner |
| 2:2012cv02115 |
| April 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Kankakee |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Michael P. McCuskey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
OPINION entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 10/15/2013. Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification 43 is GRANTED. This case is referred to Judge Bernthal so that a new scheduling order may be entered. See written opinion. (DS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 9/18/12. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation 27 is accepted by this court. (2) The Motion to Dismiss 15 filed by the City of Kankakee is GRANTED. The City of Kankakee i s terminated as a Defendant in this action. (3) The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 19 filed by Officers Trudeau and Wagner is DENIED. (4) The Motion to Dismiss 8 filed by the Sheriff of Kankakee County and Kankakee County is DENIED. Defendants are allowed twenty-one (21) days to file their Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 23 . (5) This case is referred to Judge Bernthal for further proceedings. SEE ORDER. (SKD, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
