Ibarra v. Anglin et al
| Jose Ibarra |
| Darrickson, Jaime Hernandez, Bladwer, Miss Terdy, Jody Oakley, J Balley, Gustin, Jhon T Myers and Keith O Anglin |
| 2:2012cv02127 |
| May 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Randolph |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Michael P. McCuskey |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
OPINION entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 12/2/13. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 99 is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff's claim. This case is terminated. See written Opinion. (Copy mailed to Jose Ibarra #M13620, Lawrence CC, 10930 Lawrence Rd, Sumner, IL 62466.) (KM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
95
OPINION entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 4/5/2013. Defendant Tweedy's Motion to Dismiss 76 is GRANTED. Motion to Dismiss 84 is GRANTED. Motion 94 is MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Attach Exhibits to Plaintiff's Complaint 93 is DENIED. See written opinion. Copy to the Plaintiff by way of e-filing project. (JMW, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
63
OPINION entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 11/2/2012. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 48 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint 61 is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. See written opinion. Copy to Plaintiff by way of e-filing project. (JMW, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
