Stafford v. Talbot et al
| Shawn L Stafford |
| Paul Talbot, Mary Miller and Keith Anglin |
| 2:2012cv02253 |
| September 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Vermilion |
| David G. Bernthal |
| Michael P. McCuskey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
OPINION entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 1/7/2015. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 62 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to Request Counsel 63 is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 60 is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. This case is terminated. See written opinion. (DS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 4/12/2013 granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Miller is terminated as a party in this action. This case remains schedule for a telephone status conference on 4/19/2013 at 10:30 a.m. Copy of this opinion mailed to the Plaintiff at Danville Correctional Center, 3820 E Main Street, Danville, IL 61834. (JMW, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION entered by Judge Michael P. McCuskey on 4/1/2013. Defendant Miller's Motion for Summary Judgment 26 is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Miller and against the Plaintiff. Defendant Miller is terminated as a party. See written opinion. Copy to the Plaintiff by way of e-filing project. (JMW, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
