Stevens v. Bukowski et al
DeEric M Stevens |
Timothy F Bukowski, Michael D Downey, Todd Schloendorf, Richard Ball, Zachary Tutt, Travis Molinga and Ben J Garcia |
2:2015cv02177 |
August 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Urbana Office |
Kankakee |
Sue E. Myerscough |
Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPINION: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 22 and Motions 27 46 are DENIED for the reasons stated above. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 28 is GRANTED. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgm ent in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. All pending motions are denied as moot, and this case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. Plaintiff remains responsible for the $350.00 filing fee. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 3/20/2017. (MJC, ilcd) |
Filing 10 MERIT REVIEW OPINION. Rule 16 Deadline 12/21/2015. The clerk is directed to enter the standard order granting Plaintiff's in forma pauperis petition and assessing an initial partial filing fee, if not already done, and to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 10/20/2015. (MJ, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.