Beasley et al v. Gallaway et al
| Alvin Beasley, Michael Myers and Henry Johnson |
| Cookie Gallaway and Shelly Harding |
| 2:2015cv02252 |
| October 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Vermilion |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 04/07/2016. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. (1) Plaintiff Beasley's Complaint is dismissed for impermissibly joining unrelated claims, and attempting as a non-attorney to represent a class. Pl aintiff shall have 30 days from the entry of this order in which to file an amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's amen ded complaint will replace Plaintiff's original complaint in its entirety. Accordingly, the amended complaint must contain all allegations against all Defendants. Piecemeal amendments are not accepted. (2) The claims of Michael Myers and He nry Johnson are severed. The Clerk is to open two new cases: Myers v. Vermilion County, and Johnson v. Vermilion County, and reassign the cases. (3) Plaintiffs Myers and Johnson are each to file an Amended Complaint in their individual, newly opened case, within 30 days. (DM, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
