Allen-Jones v. City of Decatur et al
| Kimberly E Allen-Jones |
| City of Decatur, Decatur Police Dept, Closen, Duffy and Unnamed Decatur Police Officers |
| 2:2016cv02089 |
| April 4, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MERIT REVIEW ORDER Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 6/30/2016. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk is directed: (1) to show Plaintiff's motion forappointment of counsel 6 as DENIED; (2) to show Plaintiff's motion for status 15 DENI ED as moot in light of this Order; (3) to add John Doe as a party Defendant; (4) to attempt service on Defendants pursuant the Court's standard procedures; and (5) to set an internal Court deadline 60 days from the entry of this Order for the Co urt to check on the status of service and enter scheduling deadlines. Lastly, it is ORDERED that, if a Defendant fails to sign and return a waiver of service to the Clerk within 30 days after the waiver is sent, the Court will take appropriate steps to effect formal service through the U.S. Marshal's Service on that defendant and will require that defendant to pay the full costs of formal service pursuant to Federal Rule ofCivil Procedure 4(d)(2).(SL, ilcd) Modified on 7/1/2016 (SL, ilcd).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
