Johnson v. West et al
| Henry Johnson |
| Karen West, Reynolds, Thompson, Broca, E Morgan and Hawkin |
| 2:2016cv02250 |
| August 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Macon |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MERIT REVIEW OPINION (Rule 16 Deadline 12/27/2016) - Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 10/25/2016. The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The cl erk is directed to terminate Sgt. Reynolds, Sgt. Thompson, Sgt. Hawkin, Dr. Broca, and Nurse E. Morgan as defendants. The clerk is directed to attempt service on the remaining defendant pursuant to the standard procedures. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction 6 is DENIED. Plaintiffs motions for copies 5 , 11 are GRANTED. As a courtesy, the clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of his complaint. In the future, if plaintiff wishes to receive a file-stamped copy of any pleading, he needs to furnish the clerk with an extra copy of that pleading, and a self-addressed, stamped envelope for returning the file-stamped copy. Any request for additional copies must be accompanied by a check for $.10 per page. (LN, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
