Adams v. Barcco et al
| Omari Adams |
| Robert Barcco, Phyliss, Kendra and Edna |
| 2:2016cv02268 |
| August 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Macon |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: The clerk is directed to terminate Defendant West. The clerk is directed to enter the standard order granting Plaintiff's in forma pauperis petition and assessing an initial partial filing fee, if not already done, and to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to send this orde r to Plaintiff at Macon County Jail and to Graham Correctional Center. The IDOC website indicates that Plaintiff is currently in Graham Correctional Center, but Plaintiff has not filed a change of address. By September 23, 2016, Plaintiff is direct ed to file a change of address or this case will be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for the Court to try to find pro bono counsel to represent him is denied 5 . Rule 16 Deadline 11/14/2016.(SEE WRITTEN OPINION) Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 9/14/2016. (GL, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
