Perez v. Doe et al
| Victor Manuel Perez |
| John Doe, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe, John Doe 2 and Jerome Combs Detention Center |
| 2:2017cv02077 |
| March 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states a constitutional claim for indifference to his serious medical needs regarding his heart/cardiovascular condition. The clerk is directed to add Chad Kolitwenzew, Chief of Corrections for Kankakee County, as a Defendant. The clerk is directed to terminate John Doe 2 (the Sheriff) and the Jerome Combs Detention Center. The clerk is directed to change the name of Defendant "Chief Judge John Doe Doctor" to "John Doe, Doctor." The clerk is directed to enter the standard order granting Plaintiff's in forma pauperis petition and assessing an initial partial filing fee, if not already done , and to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 5/4/2017. (MJC, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
