Cephus v. Department of Education

Appellant: Alonzo Cephus
Appellee: Department of Education
Case Number: 2:2017cv02118
Filed: May 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Urbana Office
County: Kankakee
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Referring Judge: Eric I. Long
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:1334
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/21/17. The Report and Recommendation 2 is accepted by this court.This appeal is dismissed due to appellant's failure to comply with the Bankruptcy Court order to pay the required filing fee. This case is terminated. See written Order. (TC, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cephus v. Department of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Alonzo Cephus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Department of Education
Represented By: David H Hoff(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?