Widmer v. Bruens et al
| Mike Widmer |
| Stacie Bruens, Ford County, Illinois, Mark Doran, . Lockhard and Advanced Health Care Solutions |
| 2:2017cv02186 |
| August 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Ford |
| Michael M. Mihm |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 2/7/2018. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. This case shall proceed solely on the claims of deliberate indifference against Defendant Bruens. All other claims will not be included in the case, except i n the Court's discretion upon motion by a party for good cause shown, or by leave of court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Defendants Ford County, Doran, Lochard and Advanced Health Care Solutions are DISMISSED. 2. Plaintiff' ;s petition to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is DENIED. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the $400 filing fee over a four month period. If he fails to do so, his case will be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion for Status Hearing 7 is rendered MOOT by this Order. 3. The Clerk is directed to send to each Defendant pursuant to this District's internal procedures: 1) a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service; 2) a Waiver of Service; 3) a copy of the Complaint; and 4) a copy of this Order. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
