Headrick v. Calloway

Headrick v. Calloway

Plaintiff:	Joshua S Headrick
Defendant:	Victor Calloway
Case Number:	2:2017cv02254
Filed:	November 6, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Urbana Office
County:	Vermilion
Presiding Judge:	Sue E. Myerscough
Presiding Judge:	Tom Schanzle-Haskins
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 25, 2018	Filing 12 SECOND MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted 67 . However, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This dismissal shall count as one of th e plaintiff's three allotted "strikes" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Plaintiff must still pay the full filing fee of $350 even though his case has been dismissed. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall continue to make monthly payments to the Clerk of Court, as directed in the Court's prior order. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A m otion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. The clerk is directed to close this case and enter judgment. See WRITTEN SECOND MERIT REVIEW OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 07/25/2018. (SKN, ilcd)
January 22, 2018	Filing 10 MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a federal claim. The Plaintiff may filed an amended complaint by February 12, 201 8. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, or in the amended complaint still fails to state a federal claim, this action will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, and a strike will be assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff's motion for the Court to appoint counsel 5 is denied. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 01/22/2018. (SKN, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 25, 2018

Filing 12 SECOND MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted 67 . However, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. This dismissal shall count as one of th e plaintiff's three allotted "strikes" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Plaintiff must still pay the full filing fee of $350 even though his case has been dismissed. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall continue to make monthly payments to the Clerk of Court, as directed in the Court's prior order. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A m otion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. The clerk is directed to close this case and enter judgment. See WRITTEN SECOND MERIT REVIEW OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 07/25/2018. (SKN, ilcd)

January 22, 2018

Filing 10 MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a federal claim. The Plaintiff may filed an amended complaint by February 12, 201 8. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, or in the amended complaint still fails to state a federal claim, this action will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, and a strike will be assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff's motion for the Court to appoint counsel 5 is denied. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 01/22/2018. (SKN, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Headrick v. Calloway
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua S Headrick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Victor Calloway
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?