Walker v. Harding et al
| Corey Lamar Walker |
| Shelly Harding, Marcie Miller, Ostenburge, Barrett, Health care staff, Public Safety Building, Owner of Public Safety Building and Vermilion County Sheriff's Dept |
| 2:2018cv02051 |
| February 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Urbana Office |
| Vermilion |
| Sara Darrow |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MERIT REVIEW OPINION Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 4/9/2018. See written Order. Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28U.S.C. § 1915A, the court finds that the plaintiff states an EighthAmendment claim for deliberate indi fference to serious medical anddental health needs against Defendants Harding, Miller, and John Doe Health Care Staff. This case is now in the process of service. The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to th e Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to terminate Ostenburge, Barrett, Public Safety Building, Owner of Public Safety Building and Vermilion County Sheriff's Dept as defendants. The clerk is directed to attempt service on the remainingdefendants pursuant to the standard procedures. Plaintiffs oral motion for counsel made at the hearing is denied, with leave to renew upon demonstrating that he made attempts to hire his own counsel. (ED, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
