Davenport v. ACME Credit Service
| Robert B Davenport |
| ACME Credit Service |
| 2:2018cv02278 |
| October 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Eric I Long |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Robert B Davenport. Responses due by 1/9/2019. (TC, ilcd) |
Filing 12
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 12/12/18 setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 1/18/19 at 10:00 AM by telephone from Urbana (court will place call) before Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long. See written Order. (TC, ilcd)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by ACME Credit Service.(Manetti, Louis) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 11/29/2018. Defendant's Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #10 is GRANTED. Defendant's deadline to file a responsive pleading is extended to December 12, 2018. (KE, ilcd)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant ACME Credit Service. Responses due by 12/10/2018 (Manetti, Louis) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Louis Joseph Manetti, Jr on behalf of ACME Credit Service (Manetti, Louis) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David M Schultz on behalf of ACME Credit Service (Schultz, David) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CLAIM 2 by Robert B Davenport. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (TC, ilcd) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT OF CLAIM 1 by Robert B Davenport. (TC, ilcd) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert B Davenport. ACME Credit Service served on 11/2/2018, answer due 11/23/2018. (DS, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ACME Credit Service. (Service packet mailed to US Marshal for service.) (TC, ilcd) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 10/29/18 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The US Marshal is directed to serve Defendant. See written Order. (TC, ilcd)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Robert B Davenport. Responses due by 11/9/18. (TC, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ACME Credit Service, filed by Robert B Davenport. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Summons, #3 USM) (TC, ilcd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/1/2018: #4 Exhibits) (TC, ilcd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davenport v. ACME Credit Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert B Davenport | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ACME Credit Service | |
| Represented By: | David M Schultz |
| Represented By: | Louis Joseph Manetti, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
