Folks v. Foster
| James E Folks |
| Craig Foster |
| Habeas Attorney General |
| 2:2018cv02287 |
| October 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Rachel Lynn Barbat on behalf of Craig Foster (Barbat, Rachel) |
Filing 6
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 11/1/2018. The Petitioner's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED. Petitioner's Motion for Service of Process at Government Expense #4 is therefore MOOT. The Respondent, Craig Foster, has sixty days to file a response. See written order. (JMB, ilcd)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Petitioner James E Folks. Responses due by 11/14/2018. (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense by Petitioner James E Folks. Responses due by 11/14/2018 (Attachments: #1 USM 285 form). (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by James E Folks. (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner James E Folks. Responses due by 11/14/2018 (Attachments: #1 Second IFP form). (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James E Folks. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (KM, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
