Mriscin v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Ronald Frank Mriscin |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| CSS-Social Security Administration |
| 2:2018cv02303 |
| November 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Eric I Long |
| James E Shadid |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ronald Frank Mriscin. US Attorney's Office served 12/27/18; Answer deadline set of 4/26/19 (Sutterfield, David). Modified on 1/7/2019 to include answer deadline (KM, ilcd). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and returned to counsel for service. (DS, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David Sutterfield on behalf of Ronald Frank Mriscin (Sutterfield, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-2983254.), filed by Ronald Frank Mriscin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Interest, #3 Summons)(Sutterfield, David) |
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/29/2018. This case is reassigned to Chief Judge James E. Shadid for further proceedings; Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long will remain as referral judge on case. All dates to remain as previously scheduled.(DS, ilcd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
