Portus Singapore Pte Ltd. et al v. Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited
Plaintiff: Portus Singapore Pte Ltd and Portus Pty Ltd
Defendant: Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited
Case Number: 2:2019cv02029
Filed: February 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Referring Judge: Eric I Long
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 3/19/19. The Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #8 is GRANTED. Defendant's deadline to file a responsive pleading is extended to April 17, 2019. (SKR, ilcd)
March 18, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (UNOPPOSED) by Plaintiffs Portus Pty Ltd, Portus Singapore Pte Ltd. Responses due by 4/1/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bennett, David)
March 8, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Portus Singapore Pte Ltd, Portus Pty Ltd. Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited served on 2/25/2019, answer due 3/18/2019. (Bennett, David)
February 7, 2019 Filing 6 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent (mailed to US Patent and Trademark Office). (SKR, ilcd)
February 7, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited and mailed to plaintiff's attorney for service. (SKR, ilcd)
February 7, 2019 Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent by Portus Pty Ltd., Portus Singapore Pte Ltd.. (Bennett, David)
February 7, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST pursuant to Local Rule 11.3 by Portus Pty Ltd., Portus Singapore Pte Ltd.. (Bennett, David)
February 7, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David R Bennett on behalf of Portus Pty Ltd., Portus Singapore Pte Ltd. (Bennett, David)
February 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3031227.), filed by Portus Singapore Pte Ltd., Portus Pty Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 8,914,526, #2 Exhibit A-1 - Evidence re Accused Instrumentality, #3 Exhibit B - U.S. Patent No. 9,961,097, #4 Exhibit B-1 - Evidence re Accused Instrumentality, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons)(Bennett, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Portus Singapore Pte Ltd. et al v. Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Portus Singapore Pte Ltd
Represented By: David R Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Portus Pty Ltd
Represented By: David R Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?